Sent: 12/6/96; 1:30:34 PM
From: grimes@access.digex.net (Seth Grimes)
You mentioned one court case from a few years ago. I think there was another, much more prominent case: Lotus sued Borland over usability of Lotus 1-2-3 macro language in QuattroPro. I believe although I'm not sure that there was just adoption of the language involved, that is, no code was stolen. Lotus won a $100 million judgement and Borland had to recall a version of QP. I think Lotus dropped trying to collect, however, because the winner of the suit was Microsoft and the original issue became irrelevant.
This page was last built on Sat, Dec 14, 1996 at 8:14:55 AM. The messages in this site are responses to DaveNet essays. |