Home > Archive > 2011 > March > 9 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I could run Scripting News from S3 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I don't want to run Apache to serve static web content. I want to have that completely taken care of for me. S3 was frustratingly close to being exactly what I want. It just got closer but still isn't exactly what I want. I could run Scripting News from an S3 bucket, but it wouldn't be accessible at scripting.com because that must be an A record, and blah blah blah. It's such a well-rehearsed story now. I subscribe to the no-www philosophy. The shorter the URL the better. I always redirect www.scripting.com to scripting.com. I've come to think of "www" as creepy. So that's the downside of hosting Scripting News at S3. And I am so annoyed by www as a prefix I would use something like s3. Try it -- it works. It's kept current. All I have to do is redirect scripting.com to s3.scripting.com and goodbye Apache. I wish Amazon would figure out how to let us use the domain name itself for one of these spiffy static sites. But I may go ahead and make the switch anyway. I think s3.scripting.com is kind of cool. |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© Copyright 1997-2011 Dave Winer. Last update: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 at 2:45 AM Eastern. Last build: 3/17/2011; 10:06:04 AM. "It's even worse than it appears." ![]() Previous / Next |