<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- RSS generated by Radio UserLand v8.0.5 on 2/27/2003; 4:00:01 PM Pacific -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">
	<channel>
		<title>Scripting News</title>
		<link>http://www.scripting.com/</link>
		<description>A weblog about scripting and stuff like that.</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<blogChannel:blogRoll>http://radio.weblogs.com/0001015/userland/scriptingNewsLeftLinks.opml</blogChannel:blogRoll>
		<blogChannel:mySubscriptions>http://radio.weblogs.com/0001015/gems/mySubscriptions.opml</blogChannel:mySubscriptions>
		<copyright>Copyright 1997-2003 Dave Winer</copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2003 00:00:01 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
		<generator>Radio UserLand v8.0.5</generator>
		<category domain="Syndic8">1765</category>
		<category domain="http://www.weblogs.com/rssUpdates/changes.xml">rssUpdates</category>
		<managingEditor>dave@userland.com</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>dave@userland.com</webMaster>
		<skipHours><!-- hours are GMT --> 
			<hour>8</hour>
			<hour>9</hour>
			<hour>10</hour>
			<hour>11</hour>
			<hour>12</hour>
			<hour>4</hour>
			<hour>5</hour>
			<hour>6</hour>
			<hour>7</hour>
			</skipHours>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<item>
			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.ft.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=FT.com/StoryFT/FullStory&amp;c=StoryFT&amp;cid=1045510979794&quot;&gt;Lessig&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;American software developers will continue to choke on software patents.&quot;</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2003 22:16:08 GMT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://scriptingnews.userland.com/backissues/2003/02/27#When:2:16:08PM</guid>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>News.Com: &lt;a href=&quot;http://rss.com.com/2100-1024-990442.html?type=pt&amp;part=rss&amp;tag=feed&amp;subj=news&quot;&gt;Google's search for new ad revenue&lt;/a&gt;. </description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2003 22:11:12 GMT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://scriptingnews.userland.com/backissues/2003/02/27#When:2:11:12PM</guid>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/2805779.stm&quot;&gt;BBC&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;A chain of UK internet cafes is offering low-cost wireless net access at its branches.&quot;</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2003 18:41:32 GMT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://scriptingnews.userland.com/backissues/2003/02/27#When:10:41:32AM</guid>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>David Davies: &lt;a href=&quot;http://radio.weblogs.com/0001161/stories/2003/02/26/mobileBloggingHowtoGuide.html&quot;&gt;Mobile blogging how-to guide&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2003 15:42:21 GMT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://scriptingnews.userland.com/backissues/2003/02/27#When:7:42:21AM</guid>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>Here's what Google can do for weblogs that would be a service to the weblog community -- classify and group them. Give me an accurate list of all the librarian weblogs, and all the lawyer weblogs, and all the weblogs of people who have implemented an XML-RPC stack. You get the idea. They have been able to do this with &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.google.com/&quot;&gt;news stories&lt;/a&gt;, it seems they should also be able to do it with weblogs. This is the biggest unsolved problem I see in this world, and I don't know how to solve it, it's not what I do. Postscript: &lt;a href=&quot;http://stir.blogspot.com/2003_02_23_stir_archive.html#90383828&quot;&gt;Tom Matrullo&lt;/a&gt; wants this too.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2003 14:45:08 GMT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://scriptingnews.userland.com/backissues/2003/02/27#When:6:45:08AM</guid>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>On this day two years ago &lt;a href=&quot;http://scriptingnews.userland.com/backissues/2001/02/27&quot;&gt;Bill Humphries found&lt;/a&gt; NASDAQ feeds in XML. They're still there and they still work. </description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2003 14:35:44 GMT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://scriptingnews.userland.com/backissues/2003/02/27#When:6:35:44AM</guid>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>I'm giving a seminar at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dartmouth.edu/&quot;&gt;Dartmouth&lt;/a&gt; on May 9 entitled &quot;Internet protocols for the Web as a writing environment.&quot; Interesting timing, because it was five years ago, to the day, that I wrote the &lt;a href=&quot;http://davenet.userland.com/1998/02/27/rpcOverHttpViaXml&quot;&gt;piece&lt;/a&gt; that inspired XML-RPC and SOAP. &quot;It's RPC over HTTP via XML. I believe it's the next protocol for runtimes.&quot;</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2003 14:11:12 GMT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://scriptingnews.userland.com/backissues/2003/02/27#When:6:11:12AM</guid>
			</item>
		<item>
			<description>It's striking how fast the new &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/aggregator&quot;&gt;community aggregator&lt;/a&gt; is. It's only subscribed to 18 feeds but it usually completes scans in &lt;i&gt;less than ten seconds.&lt;/i&gt; I figure this is because it's on a fast local network that's close to a backbone. </description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2003 14:04:26 GMT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://scriptingnews.userland.com/backissues/2003/02/27#When:6:04:26AM</guid>
			</item>
		<item>
			<title>Credit where it's due</title>
			<link>http://scriptingnews.userland.com/backissues/2003/02/27#creditWhereItsDue</link>
			<description>
				&lt;p&gt;As with many &quot;firsts&quot; on the Web, the current moblog craze was well-explored last year and the year before and likely the year before that. &lt;/p&gt;
				&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://radio.weblogs.com/0001161/2003/02/25.html#a287&quot;&gt;David Davies&lt;/a&gt;, last year, for example, blogged from the crowd at a football match, and from inside a plane. &lt;/p&gt;
				&lt;p&gt;The fact that so many things are new so many times is a &lt;i&gt;good thing,&lt;/i&gt; even though to those who came before it can be very irritating to see people claim credit for inventing what you thought you invented. Here's why it's good. Because ideas get improved, and made relevant in new contexts. It's why patents in software are so dangerous and so unlikely to be deserved.&lt;/p&gt;
				&lt;p&gt;I &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thetwowayweb.com/payloadsforrss#thisIsJustEmail&quot;&gt;explained&lt;/a&gt; it once quite concisely. &quot;Everything on the Internet is just like something else. Or if it's any good it's just like &lt;i&gt;everything else.&lt;/i&gt;&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
				&lt;p&gt;And I have a &lt;a href=&quot;http://scriptingnews.userland.com/whatIsScriptingNews#otherMottos&quot;&gt;motto&lt;/a&gt; to go with this, of course. &quot;Only steal from the best.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
				</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2003 13:37:20 GMT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://scriptingnews.userland.com/backissues/2003/02/27#creditWhereItsDue</guid>
			</item>
		</channel>
	</rss>

