<?xml encoding="ISO-8859-1" version="1.0"?>
<!-- OPML generated by OPML Editor v10.1a8 on Fri, 21 May 2010 00:25:27 GMT -->
<opml version="2.0">
	<head>
		<title>scripting.com</title>
		<dateCreated>Thu, 20 May 2010 22:01:20 GMT</dateCreated>
		<dateModified>Fri, 21 May 2010 00:25:27 GMT</dateModified>
		<ownerName></ownerName>
		<ownerId>http://www.scripting.com/</ownerId>
		<expansionState>1</expansionState>
		<vertScrollState>1</vertScrollState>
		<windowTop>113</windowTop>
		<windowLeft>332</windowLeft>
		<windowBottom>567</windowBottom>
		<windowRight>1024</windowRight>
		</head>
	<body>
		<outline created="Thu, 20 May 2010 22:01:30 GMT" text="The scoop on Google TV">
			<outline created="Thu, 20 May 2010 22:01:37 GMT" text="&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/11/17/highQualityOvertheairTv.html&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://images.scripting.com/archiveScriptingCom/2010/05/20/eyetv.jpg&quot; width=&quot;103&quot; height=&quot;245&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; hspace=&quot;15&quot; vspace=&quot;5&quot; alt=&quot;A picture named eyetv.jpg&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;I wasn't at the announcement today, but I'm very interested in this area, having gotten my &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scripting.com/2006/10/24.html#myTvHasItsOwnComputer&quot;&gt;TV through a computer&lt;/a&gt; for the last four years or so. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2364017,00.asp&quot;&gt;Google TV&lt;/a&gt; sounds interesting, and I will certainly get one. But I had to zoom in on what made it different, so I issued a challenge on Twitter and we eventually got to the core difference between the Google approach and the Apple approach."></outline>
			<outline created="Thu, 20 May 2010 22:03:05 GMT" text="With Apple, you can buy an Apple TV, as I did -- and found it seriously lacking, so I gave it away. The other choice, which is the one I use, is to hook up a Mac Mini to a regular big-screen TV, using a converter to translate DVI to HDMI, and using an optical cable to connect the sound so the digital converter in the receiver does the conversion. The theory is that the audio equipment does a better job than the computer equipment of digital-to-analog conversion."></outline>
			<outline created="Thu, 20 May 2010 22:04:47 GMT" text="I've been generally happy with this approach, but recently I switched to an old PowerPC tower Mac that I wasn't using. It has more horsepower than the Mini, and you need it if you want to do stuff (like browsing, emailing and tweeting) while watching a digital signal through an El Gato converter. "></outline>
			<outline created="Thu, 20 May 2010 22:05:56 GMT" text="Okay so how does the Google device compare?"></outline>
			<outline created="Thu, 20 May 2010 22:06:05 GMT" text="It's going to be built into the TV so it's one less box and one less set of cables. It should be cheaper. And the user interface will probably be slightly simpler. All of which are good reasons to do the product, and good reasons to get one. I hate the wire clutter that comes with using computers and am actively doing things to reduce the clutter."></outline>
			<outline created="Thu, 20 May 2010 22:06:47 GMT" text="Will it be Android or Chrome OS? Haven't gotten that far yet -- if you have data, please post comments or links. "></outline>
			<outline created="Thu, 20 May 2010 22:07:13 GMT" text="What I'm really waiting for is Cannon to integrate Android and wifi with a nice camera. The camera on my Droid is pretty nice, but Cannons take better pictures. I'd also like a very simple programming interface so I can write my own software -- but there I have pretty much abandoned hope. This is Google after all, and they are the high and mighty priesthood, a prototype for the &lt;a href=&quot;http://catb.org/esr/writings/homesteading/&quot;&gt;Cathedral&lt;/a&gt; made famous by Eric Raymond. I didn't think it was possible but they're more like Microsoft than Microsoft was. (At least Apple is honest about being proprietary and locking its users in the trunk.)"></outline>
			</outline>
		</body>
	</opml>
