<?xml encoding="ISO-8859-1" version="1.0"?>
<!-- OPML generated by OPML Editor v10.1a8 on Sat, 29 May 2010 01:17:17 GMT -->
<opml version="2.0">
	<head>
		<title>scripting.com</title>
		<dateCreated>Sat, 29 May 2010 00:56:06 GMT</dateCreated>
		<dateModified>Sat, 29 May 2010 01:17:17 GMT</dateModified>
		<ownerName>Dave Winer (Larry King)</ownerName>
		<ownerId>http://www.scripting.com/</ownerId>
		<expansionState>1, 9, 16</expansionState>
		<vertScrollState>1</vertScrollState>
		<windowTop>142</windowTop>
		<windowLeft>460</windowLeft>
		<windowBottom>709</windowBottom>
		<windowRight>1281</windowRight>
		</head>
	<body>
		<outline created="Sat, 29 May 2010 00:56:08 GMT" text="The Twitter of News?">
			<outline created="Sat, 29 May 2010 00:56:13 GMT" text="&lt;img src=&quot;http://images.scripting.com/archiveScriptingCom/2010/05/28/tales.gif&quot; width=&quot;165&quot; height=&quot;218&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; hspace=&quot;15&quot; vspace=&quot;5&quot; alt=&quot;A picture named tales.gif&quot;&gt;Liz Gannes has written an &lt;a href=&quot;http://gigaom.com/2010/05/28/digg-wants-to-be-the-twitter-of-news/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+OmMalik+%28GigaOM%29&quot;&gt;intriguing story&lt;/a&gt; about the new version of Digg coming soon, saying it aspires to be &quot;The Twitter of News.&quot; This is very interesting. "></outline>
			<outline created="Sat, 29 May 2010 01:01:30 GMT" text="&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/08/09/narrateyourwork.html#p16&quot;&gt;Think&lt;/a&gt; of Twitter as &quot;at least a dress rehearsal for the news system of the future.&quot; They gave it a diminutive name, easy to dismiss, but Twitter does something important. It makes composing and reading news easier than it's ever been. "></outline>
			<outline created="Sat, 29 May 2010 01:01:45 GMT" text="But Twitter has been standing in the same place for a long long time. Why shouldn't Digg be able to catch up and pass them in a meaningful way? If they're motivated enough and good enough the answer is they should. "></outline>
			<outline created="Sat, 29 May 2010 01:02:18 GMT" text="What's wrong with the tech industry that it lets Twitter stagnate so long without raising a serious challenge. Google didn't do it with Buzz or Wave. Yahoo could have done something with Flickr, but they're too disorganized. Even Facebook has failed to mount a realistic challenge to Twitter. "></outline>
			<outline created="Sat, 29 May 2010 01:02:42 GMT" text="So why not Digg? Let's hope they have something good. Let's also hope they have innovated with their API, kept it simple, and perhaps offer developers a little more to play with than Twitter has. "></outline>
			<outline created="Sat, 29 May 2010 01:03:23 GMT" text="It's time for some rock and roll. "></outline>
			<outline created="Sat, 29 May 2010 01:17:01 GMT" text="Update: Zee &lt;a href=&quot;http://thenextweb.com/apps/2010/05/29/woah-the-new-digg-is-twitter-revamped-for-news/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheNextWebNetwork+%28The+Next+Web+Network%29&quot;&gt;sees&lt;/a&gt; it too. &quot;;-&gt;&quot;"></outline>
			</outline>
		</body>
	</opml>
