|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Scripting News is a proud sponsor of the Web 2.2 conference, next Thursday and Friday in San Francisco, the meeting place for the cool kids in the tech business. Remember the upstairs office, the one with the nice view of the bay and the Golden Gate Bridge. Well this was moving week, my office moved from the den downstairs, where the DSL line enters the building. I have great connectivity upstairs now, but it wasn't easy! First, I asked for a bid from a contractor for a hard line connecting the two rooms, and I didn't like the price. For that amount of money I could buy a great color laser printer. I'll just use wireless for now, and see how I like it. I had tested it with my MacBook (which is working fine, no random shutdowns since it was repaired, knock wood) and it was able to get a strong enough signal to get on the net. Not very strong, but still good enough. So I took apart the dual CPU G5, and moved all the pieces upstairs (where I have a nice Aeron chair) and hooked them up, turned on the Airport, and it couldn't find the wireless router. Gulllp. I guess the desktop doesn't have as good wifi as the laptop does? Hmmm. Okay, I had bought a second Airport Express, because I wanted to experiment with piping music around the house from my desktop, so okay, let's try using it to extend the range of the Mini, which I was using as my wifi base. Well that didn't work, because apparently it can only be used to extend an Airport. The problem then was that the new Airport Express didn't work. After I set it up initially nothing I could do would make it show up on any of my computers. Every attempt to reinitialize it failed. So I went to sleep and figured I'd go down to Best Buy and get a new Netgear or Linksys in the morning. But when I woke up, I had fresh energy, and I did some searches and found that the Airport has to be plugged in when you push the bent paper clip into its port and hold it in for five seconds and when I did this, sure enough the light started flashing orange and then green, and I carefully set up both Airports, took frequent breaks to contemplate my good fortune, to pray for wisdom from Murphy, and crossing all my fingers and breathing deeply, and being totally sure a dialog would appear telling me it didn't work. After a number of attempts, with proper humility and low expectations, everything worked! I'm on the second floor, the second Airport is directly below me in the living room, and it's wirelessly connected to the other Airport on the other end of the house, which in turn is connected to the DSL router and onto the Internet. The Mac Mini has a hard line into the router, and all the computers can see each other and share files and I'm one fukcing happy dude! That all happened yesterday. Today I recieved guests from NYC, and then went out for a walk. When I came back I decided to tempt fate and try to use the same Airport I used to extend the reach of the other Airport to pipe music from the desktop upstairs, wirelessly to a radio in the living room, connected to the Airport by a mini jack. And, again, holding my breath, crossing all my fingers, I jacked it in, and damn if it didn't work the first time! I am the wizard of my domain. Master of the airwaves in my Internet craftsman house. Ready for new challenges! Doc Searls: "Where would RSS, blogging, podcasting or outlining be today if Dave Winer had locked his ideas behind patents?" Thanks Doc, I really love getting credit for my work. That's why I proposed that the tech industry grant honorary patents with no legal value to people who contribute their creative work for free. A nice award you can put on the mantle over the fireplace, and for adorning the Wikipedia page with, but not in any way keeping people from using the ideas. Something like the Creative Commons, but for patents. I suggested this during the One-Click controversy, not sure if anyone was listening. In 2002, after the World Series, I wrote of baseball: "Baseball is nothing if not history. That's why the business of baseball is so disconcerting." I realize now that the same is true of software. It takes a huge amount of trial and error to weed out the nuggets and then infinite patience to help other people see the light, only to have greedy business people come along, after all the work is done, and say the idea was obvious, or worse, theirs. If I could get one idea through to people who write about the business people as if they were the Hank Aarons and Ty Cobbs of software, that would be it. You had to love baseball to love Pete Rose, but there's a bit of his spirit in every winning idea in software. And sure, some people don't like Pete Rose, but then what do they know about baseball? BTW, if you watched the World Series this year, did you see a bit of the Charlie Hustle spirit channeled in the series MVP, David Eckstein? In the last month, two leading gay Republicans have been outed. If Foley hadn't also been implicated as a pedophile and Haggard as a meth user it still would be significant because their party makes such a big deal of its homophobia. You have to assume that both Haggard and Foley were aware of the risks, still here are two Republican men who chose not to (or maybe can't) control their sexual attraction to other men. How many more must there be who are more careful. It seems that party preference may not be an indicator of sexual preference. Homosexuality is not a major issue for our country. Yes, there are homosexuals. I think most Americans understand that, and now the news is available to the Christian Right. Let's get beyond villifiying ourselves, esp ones who aren't doing harm to others, and focus on Republicans who are willfully causing the deaths of thousands of Americans and hundreds of thousands of Iraqis. Andrew Sullivan: "The Wired: Gannett to Crowdsource News. Wow, that Wired story on Gannett is big news. It's going to work, for someone, at some time. Gannett may be biting off too much at once, but really big kudos to them for taking the dive. I'd love to help with this, so if anyone from Gannett is tuned in, how can I find out more? I wrote about this just last month, counseling a more gradual transition to the web and incorporating reports from the citizen media. I don't like the term "crowdsource" -- it's demeaning and not accurate, and betrays an arrogant point of view, kind of like calling your customers "consumers." Yuck. Also, to my friends in the tech industry, you can build from the other direction too. Last month you could have bought a major newspaper for a song. Imagine a web-citizen news organization called The Philadelphia Inquirer. The brand alone is worth a fair amount of money, imho. Another point, I love how they're transitioning the newsroom! I was thinking about that too. Here's a diagram of my Newsroom of the Future. |
Comment on today's |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© Copyright 1997-2006 Dave Winer. Previous/Next |