Click here to show or hide the menubar.

Home >  Archive >  2012 >  May >  27

Previous / Next

Wikipedia and explainers
By Dave Winer on Sunday, May 27, 2012 at 10:40 AM.
Jay Rosen talks about the idea of explainers.  permalink
A picture named clarinet.gifPeople say they use Wikipedia as the source of explainers. I realize I do too. Now the question is this -- is Wikipedia the best we can do? Because what it does is necessary. permalink
For example, in my previous piece, I wanted to link to an explainer about woodwinds. If there was a good one, I wouldn't have to say anything more, which as a writer I appreciate. As a reader I appreciate it too. The link is much better than a one or two sentence inline summary. Maybe I'll find the topic very interesting and want to explore it in more than a passing way. So a link to a good explainer is a great deal. Esp if it presents the information in a tiered way. First the two-sentence explainer. Then a little deeper. Then finally full depth. permalink
When I saw the Wikipedia page on woodwinds, I thought to myself that we can do much better than this.  permalink
The most important thing about woodwinds, imho, that you need to say right up front in a clear and visual way, is there are two families of woodwinds, flutes and reed instruments. That way if you know your instruments but not the classes, you've got everything you absolutely need to know what the term means. At least that's what I was looking for from the explainer. permalink
I would like to see that communicated both in words and in an illustration with pictures of all the instruments, in a format that could be clipped and pasted into my story (with a link back to the article of course). permalink
The value of Wikipedia is they've got an editorial system that millions of people use, and a process that gets some remarkably good reference information in one place where you need it. But the presentation lacks something, and honestly, their vetting process lets some pretty egregious stuff through. And unless you're committed to constant online bickering, you can't easily add your knowledge to the base. permalink
Wikipedia is good for where we are now. But it isn't as good as we can do.  permalink
This site contributes to the community river.

© Copyright 1997-2012 Dave Winer. Last update: Sunday, May 27, 2012 at 11:14 PM Eastern. Last build: 5/31/2012; 9:34:51 AM. "It's even worse than it appears."

RSS feed for Scripting News

Previous / Next