Respect the reader. This isn't exactly a new rule for journalism, but it's worth mentioning anyway. If you wouldn't want to read the piece yourself, don't let them put your name on it. Example. A story promises to tell you about 47 seconds that saved Kamala Harris's career. They do eventually tell you the words, but you have to wade through a lot of pointless bullshit to get to it. If I were writing it, the first words of the piece would have to be the words, and then explain it. You've seen this over and over and it gets worse all the time. I still don't understand why they do it, if I'm reading the piece, I'm a paying subscriber, right? Another example of disrespect, quit trying to upsell paying customers. Once a month maybe, but not every 8th time I visit your site. Most businesses have no regard for their customers' time, but the ones that do, really make an impression. #The Wikipedia page for Living Videotext begins with one of our slogans. It was a joke, and meant to keep us humble, so we listen to users. It was one of many such slogans. LVT made some important contributions to the networks we use today. Wikipedia should talk about that first, show some respect, for crying out loud. Otherwise, except for that snipe up front, the account is actually pretty accurate. #
It's nice to see the DNC including influencers this year. I hear them say this is the first time, but I beg to disagree. A few dozen bloggers were at the DNC in 2004, and were treated well, in many ways. I think the word influencer and blogger have fairly similar meanings. Blogger is a broader term, because it's possible to have a very small readership for a blog, thus not be influencing very much, but still have a lot of value. And you always can influence your mom and little sister, right? 😄#
Note: I had a quote here that appeared to be from actor Keanu Reeves. It was a good sentiment, but it apparently was not from Reeves. Thanks to Andy Piper for catching this. Here's the quote. "If you see someone falling behind, walk beside them. If you see someone being ignored, find a way to include them. Always remind people of their worth. One small act could mean the world to them." #
- Elon Musk bought the biggest airport on the social web. A major world hub like Atlanta, London or Dubai. #
- Bluesky is a regional airport in a cool place, maybe Austin. #
- Mastodon is a network of airports, like the ones served by Ryanair in Europe. #
- Threads is potentially one of the big airports like the one Musk bought, but it's not as much of a hub yet. Orlando? Frankfurt? #
- There are lots of scheduled flights in and out of X because it's where most of the traffic already goes. It's quite possibly not running that smoothly, like perhaps JFK in NYC, always a mess, under construction, huge traffic, broken systems. #
- But it does actually work pretty reliably most of the time. #
When I was first getting started in tech, when we got the initial angel funding for LVT, I asked the lead investor, Bill Jordan, if Apple was going to go out of business. At the time, 1983, a lot of people said it would. He asked what their sales were. $1 billion, I said. He said they're not going away. Companies that large don't disappear. After 40 years of experience in tech since then, Bill was right. Companies that lead markets very rarely disappear. It does happen. But not often. More likely is Musk will right the ship, and it will grow to dominate the market. Threads will possibly be Pepsi or Avis. Mastodon will be Home Depot. Bluesky will be Laurel Canyon. Or who knows? #- But there's a high probability that Musk's company will be the market leader for the forseeable future. #
- I'm working on a project which may or may not ship, but it presents an interesting design challenge either way.#
- The idea is I want to write lots of little bits, less than 5000 characters each, they have titles, use styling, links, include images, etc. #
- Or it could also be as small as a single emoji.#
- This is what we've settled on in 2024 as the basic unit of writing. From a tweet to a long blog post. #
- I want to make an editor and storage system that fits this model perfectly based on all we know about this stuff, and the latest server and network technologies. #
- It should have the best simplest API we know how to make in 2024.#
- In every way it'll be the nicest, fastest and most flexible way to create structures of writing over time.#
- In that last sentence is the gotcha -- over time. It's the frontier, the leading edge. Because in 2024 there's no way for me, as an individual developer to create a structure that lasts over time. #
- I can create a structure that has a high probability of lasting a month. A pretty good chance of lasting a few years, but beyond that, it gets less likely probably at a pretty good clip and eventually goes over a cliff. #
- The way I have answered that in the past was with GitHub.#
- In 2017, I started an archive of my Scripting News writing on GitHub. It's still just a fraction of my writing, I'm not doing anything like that for all my other sites and services. But at least I've managed to set up a system that only requires me to do something once a month, which is something I like to do because it gives me some assurance the other mechanisms are still working. Archive systems have bugs too.#
- So I guess for the project I'm doing I will again use GitHub to mirror the content in the database until and unless GitHub proves unusable for this purpose, or something much better comes along. #
- Note that GitHub has made no promise about the continued availability of their service, all we have to go on is that they have been reliable for enough time to present the illusion of persistence. 😄#
- I was kvelling the other day about rss.app and how they have feeds for Threads accounts. They do. But there are two caveats.#
- It costs $9.99 per month for 15 feeds. Could be a bit expensive for some people's budgets.#
The second concern is more serious. It doesn't handle titleless items properly. It repeats the contents of the tweet in the title and description of the feeds it generates. An example. This is not right, and it's not the way Mastodon and Bluesky do it. There's nothing wrong with items that have no titles. When an item has no title you do the common sense thing -- omit the title. I'm happy to help with this. I wrote the RSS 2.0 spec, and am something of an authority on this. It's important to get this right.#