I want writing to be as open as podcasting. The pattern is ridiculously easy to apply. If this were on a a high school math test, it would be too easy, everyone would get it right. How do you make text work like podcasting? 1. You look for a brain-dead obvious choice for text. 2. And then attach it to a format that's really good for transmitting packets of text. And then write some software that works really well with the obvious choices. The user retains ownership of the writing, pays for the storage, and can give access to the apps they want to use. They can also, for a fee, point a domain name to one of the nodes in their storage. This would radically change the economics for independent developers. Now we don't have to resell storage. Producs can be developed on our kitchen tables. There is an explosion of interest in developing software. Think it through -- how the hell are they supposed to deploy their apps on the web? We need a BigCo that thinks like an entrepreneurial startup. How many times have I written this screed? Geez I don't like to think about that. #
After last night's game I now remember why I was so relieved last season when the Knicks were eliminated in the semifinals of the NBA playoffs. It’s an exhausting sport. And the sad truth is the Knicks are getting beaten by Atlanta. Or maybe it's not so sad, because then, after they are eliminated, I can tune into the playoffs with a detached interest, and save my kvetching for the Mets, and there is plenty to complain about there, LGM. (I could have linked directly to the Wikipedia page for Lets Go Mets, but they hacked up the slogan, and I refuse to support that.)#- I almost never question a coach's decisions, because they have complicated jobs but -- why didn't they put their top defenders, Mitchell Robinson or KAT on the court with 12 seconds left in the fourth quarter with the Knicks ahead by 1. Instead they put in all these fast small players, as if they were planning on giving up a bucket and then quickly running down the court with what little time remained and scoring a quick one to win the freaking game. At least that's what I imagined they were doing. Why not just hold them right there and run out the clock and win the game?? It all happened so fast. (I asked ChatGPT about this theory and it says I'm wrong, they put in the small players because they can switch more easily, and that's likely how Atlanta was planning to defend their shooter.)#
- The Knicks were out of timeouts, so they couldn't stop the clock. So I guess kind of predictably, esp the way things were going last night, the Hawk with the Hot Hand, CJ McCollum, gets the ball, dribbles a bit, and nails the shot that wins the game and now the Knicks are down 2-1 in a series they were supposed to win handily. #
- I didn't and don't buy the idea that the Knicks are destined to appear in the finals this year, when you boast about it, or expect it, god has a way of goofing on you, making sure you don't get it. The Knicks don't have it, because as great as Brunson is, he sucks all the energy out of the rest of the team, and when he's having a bad night, there really isn't an alternative. It's not a good configuration. As in the Melo years, Brunson doesn't make it as the captain, imho. #
- Melo had the size and talent, but he's sweet labrador retriever type player, the sidekick of the engine of the team, somone like LeBron James, Steph Curry or Giannis Antetokounmpo. Look at how successful Melo was in the Olympics, where he could be #2 to LeBron's #1. #
- It's not just about skill and hard work, it's about does the team follow you. That isn't something you can learn, you either have it or you don't. And of course I will torture myself in this mode, wondering in vain how my Knicks will fare in this quarter, or that game -- until I get to retire from the NBA for the year, and instead get a big fat bellyache on about the Mets. #